2022年PRX、PRL发文统计（至10.16，南科大、华科升位）
本帖最后由 八度天下 于 2022-10-16 21:33 编辑1. 仅统计第一作者和通讯作者一致的第一单位，本次更新2022.1.1~2022.10.16
2. 2021统计见：
2021各校PRL发文数量统计
2021年Nature Phy、PRX、PRL发文（更毕）
中国科学技术大学39北京大学23清华大学20上海交通大学17南京大学15南方科技大学9华中科技大学7华东师范大学5复旦大学5浙江大学5北京师范大学5武汉大学4吉林大学 4同济大学4南京理工大学4上海科技大学4北京航空航天大学 3电子科技大学3南开大学3湖南大学3郑州大学3
国防科技大学2厦门大学 2西安交通大学2北京理工大学2南京航空航天大学2济南大学2华中师范大学2
本帖最后由 八度天下 于 2022-10-16 21:36 编辑
中国科学技术大学39
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.050506
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.030502
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.060402
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.180501
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.050503
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.110506
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.033401
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.231803
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.043601
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.030501
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.060501
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.060502
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.060401
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.040403
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.051801
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.233201
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.170501
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.063605
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.120402
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.096601
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.250401
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.160502
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.090602
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.110501
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.050402
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.036801
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.020502
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.050502
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.180502
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.046401
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.190503
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.077001
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.018101
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.083001https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.100501https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.140401https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.150402https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.163201https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.163602北京大学23https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.056403https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.172002https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.056401https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.052003https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.062002https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.236601https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.066601https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.200401https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.056601https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.172501https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.035501https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.067201https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.073901https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.236401https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.047601https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.053903https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.017201https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.013402https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.073901https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.096601https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.107601https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.120505https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.147202清华大学20https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011062https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.120502https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.026101https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.120401https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.226101https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.011603https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.167202https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.195301https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.080501https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.076803https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.027401https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.197202https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.160504https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.044501https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.200502https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.223903https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.093001https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.104501https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.128101https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.167702上海交通大学17https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.021040https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.016801https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.011602https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.154101https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.021602https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.050503https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.050601https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.244801https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.171801https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.052501https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.081601https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.033601https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.246401https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.206802
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.106802https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.098001https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.161803南京大学15https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011022https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011053https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.137001https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.027001https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.115701https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.057202https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.203602https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.023601https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.083604https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.053901https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.035702https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.084301https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.097203https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.125501https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.120507南方科技大学9https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.021016https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.040502https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.040402https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.083605https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.095702https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.070502https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.100603https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.125502https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.150401华中科技大学7https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.217401https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.027401https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.197201https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.200501https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.117201https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.127401https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.141101复旦大学5https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.021020https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.137201https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.011805https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.226102https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.167201浙江大学5https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.182001https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.013902https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.190502https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.070401https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.123601北京师范大学5https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.206805https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.046001https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.056803
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.076802https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.076803华东师范大学5https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011002https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.243201https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.126402https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.057402https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.060503吉林大学 4https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.023001https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.167001https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.047001https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.106001武汉大学4https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.224301https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.116803https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.216403https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.108103
北京理工大学4https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.258001https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.253901https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.097201https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.096402南京理工大学4https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.021030https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.162301https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.067601https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.047401同济大学4https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.021056https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.067701https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.247202https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.053902上海科技大学4https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.021065https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.026403https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.247402https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.156401南开大学3https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.062003https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.035703https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.035702北京航空航天大学 3https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.026405https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.142002https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.217702电子科技大学 3https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.112001https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.107203https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.120503湖南大学3https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.193601https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.065701https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.126401西北大学 3https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.197801https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.076403https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.130602郑州大学3https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.050603https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.253601https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.013604厦门大学 2https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.204501https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.134101西安交通大学2https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.174801https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.240402国防科技大学2https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.133601https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.167402南京航空航天大学2https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.104501https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.047602华中师范大学2https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.142003https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.022302济南大学2https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.161105https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.193901中南大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.126101华南理工大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.257401兰州大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.036402西北工业大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.187401中山大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.257201四川大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.131301山东大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.202302南京师范大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.021801华东理工大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.206001北京科技大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.054502北京工业大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.015701湖南师范大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.063602西南大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.112002中国矿业大学徐州https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.117603华南师范大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.093604山西大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.103401深圳大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.213904河南大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.026802陕西科技大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.123903首都师范大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.093902华侨大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.154301湖州大学https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.013001
科科比北清加起来还多？交交也这么猛？ 科大比清北加起来还多:o 李政道研究所，是不是算交大的？ 本帖最后由 曾经沧海难为水 于 2022-8-6 14:18 编辑
第一单位和通讯作者不一致的第一单位，科大只有一篇，第一单位总33+1。
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.146102
已接收 未在线的存量比较少
Measurement of the electric dipole moment of
171
Yb atoms in an optical dipole trap
T. A. Zheng, Y. A. Yang, S. -Z. Wang, J. T. Singh, Z. -X. Xiong, T. Xia, and Z. -T. Lu
Accepted 14 July 2022
Experimental investigation of quantum correlations in a two-qutrit spin system
Yue Fu, Wenquan Liu, Xiangyu Ye, Ya Wang, Chengjie Zhang, Chang-Kui Duan, Xing Rong, and Jiangfeng Du
Accepted 5 August 2022 科大太猛了 南大2+9=11篇。你少算了一篇。 都不算接受的，算在线的。 我交的物理学科发展走上了正规 牛批牛批 科科=交交+南南+旦旦+浙浙 科大太强了，清北交也很猛。赞楼主的统计 这两篇是上海交大的，你统计的时候交大只列了13篇，实际交大应该是 15篇。
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.206802
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.106802 michellez 发表于 2022-8-6 14:27
科科=交交+南南+旦旦+浙浙
科大>清华+北大 科大恐怖如斯 这篇南大孙健的，你漏掉了。
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.035702
所以南大是 2+9=11篇。
上半年南大PRL明显相比去年慢了很多，去年全年是24篇。下半年希望加油。 dylanct 发表于 2022-8-6 14:58
这篇南大孙健的，你漏掉了。
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.035702
最近南大的PRL节奏稍微快了一点 华师大也这么猛 拉了呀崽崽 拉了呀 上面列的南大不是12？prx2+prl10 zgjm 发表于 2022-8-6 15:03
上面列的南大不是12？prx2+prl10
最后两篇是上交大的，楼主可能放错地方了，不过南大还有1篇孙建老师的prl，应该是11篇，现在接收未上线的还有两篇，程建春和丁海峰的。上半年发挥平平常常，科大一如既往的牛，交大发挥非常出色，复浙需要努力。 zgjm 发表于 2022-8-6 15:03
上面列的南大不是12？prx2+prl10
前面dylact说了有两篇是上交的，列到南大那里去了。而另外南大少列了一篇 本帖最后由 海盗王去哦 于 2022-8-6 15:32 编辑
高能物理吃亏了，都是国际合作，上百人、几十个单位署名 海盗王去哦 发表于 2022-8-6 15:12
高能物理吃亏了，都是国际合作，上报人、几十个单位署名
对。高能物理南大的金山教授领衔参与，今年发了好几篇主刊和PRL系列。
但好像还是高能所为第一单位的。国内主要大学都有参与。所以不统计也是合情合理。 同济应该3prl，一prx 湖大不错:lol michellez 发表于 2022-8-6 15:08
前面dylact说了有两篇是上交的，列到南大那里去了。而另外南大少列了一篇 ...
了解了，谢谢。 八度天下 发表于 2022-8-6 13:57
中国科学技术大学33
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.050506
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevL ...
南大最后一篇未加超链接。 数据贴:victory: