|
|
本帖最后由 suibjsm 于 2026-7-26 08:02 编辑
一作已回应
Yuanhang Yang 袁航杨 comment accepted July 2026 评论已接受，时间：2026 年 7 月 作者回应 #1
Thank you for pointing out the duplicated segment in Fig. 4A. #1 感谢您指出来图 4A 中重复的部分。 After re-examining the stability records, we confirmed that the duplication resulted from the inadvertent reuse of a backup data segment that had already been included in the plotted curve during figure preparation. To clarify, the repeated features correspond to this overlapping backup data segment being unintentionally plotted again in a later portion of the curve, rather than two independent stability intervals showing unexpectedly similar behavior. The original measurement records remain intact and unaltered. 经过重新检查稳定性数据记录后，我们确认这种重复现象是由于在准备图表时无意中使用了已经包含在曲线中的备份数据段所导致的。具体来说，那些重复出现的特征实际上是指，在曲线的后续部分，那个重叠的备份数据段被无意中再次绘制了出来，而不是两个独立的稳定性区间表现出类似的行为。原始的测量记录仍然保持完整，没有发生任何改变。 We have corrected the aging curve using the complete source records. The corrected result shows the same overall degradation trend and the same stability advantage of the target device over the control, and does not change the conclusions of the paper. 我们已经根据完整的源数据修正了老化曲线。修正后的结果显示，目标设备的整体退化趋势与对照组相同，其稳定性优势也保持不变。因此，这一修正并不改变论文的结论。 We apologize for this oversight during figure preparation. 我们为在整理图表时出现的这一疏忽表示歉意。
|
|
发表于 
楼主
